Duplicate candidate unverified#

This page is generated from the code and must not be edited by hand.

Not available in this version. Files that look like copies of one another but whose contents were never compared are flagged for checking, except where every one sits in an organizing folder.

duplicate_candidate_unverified version 1+d1

  • Kind of rule: What is raised for attention (flags). Raises something for a person’s attention without concluding anything.

  • What it concludes: a finding

  • Reasoning: defeasible. A conclusion is usually right, and is retracted when a rule it names concludes against it.

  • What it reads: one file at a time

Is it available in this version?#

Not available in this version. Its test is declared and not written yet, so the engine skips it and it concludes nothing.

What would defeat it#

A finding is never withdrawn. When any of these rules also concludes about the same thing, the finding records it:

  • installed_software_in_folder: A folder is recognized as an installed program, such as a copy of Fiji or a Python environment, from the parts it holds, a name ending .app, its program-style subfolders or a majority of program files; its files are still indexed and read, and rules about experiments leave them alone.

It stands aside beneath every folder one of these rules raises:

Parameters#

Parameter

Shipped value

May be

What it does

member_respect

"observed_metadata"

text

The respect the unverified group is equivalent in.

minimum_members

2

whole number, from 2 to 10000

How many members make the comparison worth raising.

ignore_organising_folders

true

yes or no

Whether copies inside folders classified as organizing are treated as expected rather than raised. An expected repetition is not a duplicate, and the distinction is what keeps this list short enough to read.