Repudiated by name#

This page is generated from the code and must not be edited by hand.

A file is flagged when its name says not to use it, with a word such as ignore, failed or contaminated.

repudiated_by_name version 1+d1

Kind of rule: What is raised for attention (flags). Raises something for a person’s attention without concluding anything.
What it concludes: a finding
Reasoning: defeasible. A conclusion is usually right, and is retracted when a rule it names concludes against it.
What it reads: one folder at a time

Is it available in this version?#

Yes. The engine runs it.

A finding is never withdrawn. When any of these rules also concludes about the same thing, the finding records it:

installed_software_in_folder: A folder is recognized as an installed program, such as a copy of Fiji or a Python environment, from the parts it holds, a name ending .app, its program-style subfolders or a majority of program files; its files are still indexed and read, and rules about experiments leave them alone.

It stands aside beneath every folder one of these rules raises:

Parameter	Shipped value	May be	What it does
`senses`	`["do_not_use", "ignore", "deprecated", "delete", "wrong", "broken", "failed", "contaminated"]`	list of text	The terms that repudiate rather than merely doubt. Terms the lexicon marks as ordinary vocabulary somewhere are absent: a file about a test statistic is not a test file, and a control is not doubtful.
`minimum_terms`	`1`	whole number, from 1 to 10	How many such terms a name needs. One, because nobody writes any of these by accident.